{ "currentVersion": 10.71, "cimVersion": "2.4.0", "serviceDescription": "", "mapName": "Zonation_Biiodiv_Use_Prioritisation", "description": "", "copyrightText": "", "supportsDynamicLayers": true, "layers": [ { "id": 0, "name": "Management Areas and Type I MPAs (Marine Reserves) ", "parentLayerId": -1, "defaultVisibility": true, "subLayerIds": null, "minScale": 0, "maxScale": 0, "type": "Raster Layer", "supportsDynamicLegends": false }, { "id": 1, "name": "Prioritisation Balancing Biodiversity Conservation and Use", "parentLayerId": -1, "defaultVisibility": true, "subLayerIds": null, "minScale": 0, "maxScale": 0, "type": "Raster Layer", "supportsDynamicLegends": false } ], "tables": [], "spatialReference": { "wkt": "PROJCS[\"WGS_1984_Albers\",GEOGCS[\"GCS_WGS_1984\",DATUM[\"D_WGS_1984\",SPHEROID[\"WGS_1984\",6378137.0,298.257223563]],PRIMEM[\"Greenwich\",0.0],UNIT[\"Degree\",0.0174532925199433]],PROJECTION[\"Albers\"],PARAMETER[\"false_easting\",0.0],PARAMETER[\"false_northing\",0.0],PARAMETER[\"central_meridian\",175.0],PARAMETER[\"standard_parallel_1\",-30.0],PARAMETER[\"standard_parallel_2\",-50.0],PARAMETER[\"latitude_of_origin\",-40.0],UNIT[\"Meter\",1.0]]", "xyTolerance": 0.001, "zTolerance": 0.001, "mTolerance": 0.001, "falseX": -16381800, "falseY": -14264900, "xyUnits": 2.7491482177602553E8, "falseZ": -100000, "zUnits": 10000, "falseM": -100000, "mUnits": 10000 }, "singleFusedMapCache": false, "initialExtent": { "xmin": -201674.8594299222, "ymin": 128027.3030527796, "xmax": 290579.6027265885, "ymax": 614166.8029464765, "spatialReference": { "wkt": "PROJCS[\"WGS_1984_Albers\",GEOGCS[\"GCS_WGS_1984\",DATUM[\"D_WGS_1984\",SPHEROID[\"WGS_1984\",6378137.0,298.257223563]],PRIMEM[\"Greenwich\",0.0],UNIT[\"Degree\",0.0174532925199433]],PROJECTION[\"Albers\"],PARAMETER[\"false_easting\",0.0],PARAMETER[\"false_northing\",0.0],PARAMETER[\"central_meridian\",175.0],PARAMETER[\"standard_parallel_1\",-30.0],PARAMETER[\"standard_parallel_2\",-50.0],PARAMETER[\"latitude_of_origin\",-40.0],UNIT[\"Meter\",1.0]]", "xyTolerance": 0.001, "zTolerance": 0.001, "mTolerance": 0.001, "falseX": -16381800, "falseY": -14264900, "xyUnits": 2.7491482177602553E8, "falseZ": -100000, "zUnits": 10000, "falseM": -100000, "mUnits": 10000 } }, "fullExtent": { "xmin": -60000, "ymin": 189999.9998779297, "xmax": 130000, "ymax": 499999.9998779297, "spatialReference": { "wkt": "PROJCS[\"WGS_1984_Albers\",GEOGCS[\"GCS_WGS_1984\",DATUM[\"D_WGS_1984\",SPHEROID[\"WGS_1984\",6378137.0,298.257223563]],PRIMEM[\"Greenwich\",0.0],UNIT[\"Degree\",0.0174532925199433]],PROJECTION[\"Albers\"],PARAMETER[\"false_easting\",0.0],PARAMETER[\"false_northing\",0.0],PARAMETER[\"central_meridian\",175.0],PARAMETER[\"standard_parallel_1\",-30.0],PARAMETER[\"standard_parallel_2\",-50.0],PARAMETER[\"latitude_of_origin\",-40.0],UNIT[\"Meter\",1.0]]", "xyTolerance": 0.001, "zTolerance": 0.001, "mTolerance": 0.001, "falseX": -16381800, "falseY": -14264900, "xyUnits": 2.7491482177602553E8, "falseZ": -100000, "zUnits": 10000, "falseM": -100000, "mUnits": 10000 } }, "minScale": 0, "maxScale": 0, "units": "esriMeters", "supportedImageFormatTypes": "PNG32,PNG24,PNG,JPG,DIB,TIFF,EMF,PS,PDF,GIF,SVG,SVGZ,BMP", "documentInfo": { "Title": "MyProject2.aprx", "Author": "", "Comments": "Zonation was used to model representation of marine biodiversity within the Hauraki Gulf Marine Park, while minimising impacts on existing resource use activities. The analysed data layers were raster data (gridded cells) at a resolution of 200m2. Data included in the analysis:We included 5 biogenic habitat layers, 95 demersal fish species layers, and 59 reef fish layers. The demersal and reef fish layers were included as surrogates for overall biodiversity. To account for neighbourhood influences of connectivity or edge effects in the biogenic habitat layers, a distribution smoothing function (5 km radius) was applied in Zonationto facilitate habitat connectivity. A matrix connectivity function - to recognise interactions between layers within each of the two habitat groups- was also specified.Within the demersal fish species group of layers, endemic species were weighted 5-times higher than non-endemic species. The group of biogenic habitat layers was also weighted twice as high as the other groups of layers because of the tendency for biodiversity to be higher in biogenic habitats than surrounding less complex ones. A hierarchical removal mask was included to hold back existing MPAs until all other locations were removed from the analysis, forcing them to have the highest rankings in the results. The removal mask was also used to exclude designated use areas (approved aquaculture consents, sand extraction, military zones, dredging zones and dedicated shipping zones) before any other locations were prioritized, forcing them to have the lowest rankings. To allow consideration of existing extractive activities, we included negatively weighted (-50) resource use layers for scallop grounds, recreational fishing, snapper catch intensity, trawling, and long line fishing. These negative weights constrain Zonation\u2019s ability to prioritize locations that are important for existing resource uses, allowing the balancing of conservation priorities and existing use activities.", "Subject": "Areas that contribute most to biodiversity representation, while minimising impacts on existing resource use activities in the Hauraki Gulf Marine Park. Areas are ranked from low to high; highly ranked areas provide the most efficient representation", "Category": "", "AntialiasingMode": "None", "TextAntialiasingMode": "Force", "Keywords": "Zonation,Biodiversity,Resource Use,Conservation Prioritisation" }, "capabilities": "Map,Query,Data", "supportedQueryFormats": "JSON, geoJSON, PBF", "exportTilesAllowed": false, "supportsDatumTransformation": true, "archivingInfo": {"supportsHistoricMoment": false}, "maxRecordCount": 2000, "maxImageHeight": 4096, "maxImageWidth": 4096, "supportedExtensions": "" }